Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A vs Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus: Does The New XUV 3XO Variant Hold Up Against One-below Top Trim Of Kylaq
With the new REVX A variant commanding a premium over the Prestige trim of the Kylaq, does it deliver enough to justify the price? Find out
Mahindra recently expanded the XUV 3XO lineup with the introduction of new trims, including the REVX A variant. It is the most affordable variant in the XUV 3XO lineup to be offered with the 130 PS turbo-petrol engine. On the other hand, the Skoda Kylaq in its Signature Plus trim stands as one of the most feature-loaded options, paired with a punchy turbo-petrol engine.
In this report, we compare the higher-spec variants of both models to find out which one you should go for.
Price
| Model |
Price (ex-showroom) |
| Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A |
Rs 11.80 lakh to Rs 13 lakh |
| Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus AT |
Rs 11.25 lakh to Rs 12.35 lakh |
The XUV 3XO REVX A undercuts the Kylaq Signature Plus by Rs 65,000 when you consider their automatic transmission variants. Notably, both the variants are also offered with a manual gearbox choice as well. The price difference between them is Rs 55,000, making the Kylaq an affordable option over the XUV 3XO.
Dimensions
| Mahindra XUV 3XO |
Skoda Kylaq |
Difference |
|
| Length |
3990 mm |
3995 mm |
-5 mm |
| Width |
1821 mm |
1783mm |
+38 mm |
| Height |
1647 mm (with roof rails) |
1619 mm (with roof rails) |
+28 mm |
| Wheelbase |
2600 mm |
2566 mm |
+34 mm |
| Boot space |
364 litres |
360 litres |
4 litres |
The XUV 3XO and Kylaq are close rivals in the subcompact SUV space, and it is reflected in their nearly similar dimensions. The Kylaq is just 5 mm longer, but the XUV 3XO has a 34 mm longer wheelbase, which could mean better interior space. The XUV 3XO also stands wider and taller, giving it a stronger road presence. On the practicality front, the XUV 3XO edges ahead slightly with a 364-litre boot, offering 4 litres more than the Kylaq.
Powertrain
| Model |
Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A |
Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus |
| Engine Capacity |
1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine |
1-litre turbo-petrol engine |
| Power |
130 PS |
115 PS |
| Torque |
230 Nm |
178 Nm |
| Transmission |
6-speed MT/ 6-speed AT |
6-speed MT/ 6-speed AT |
With its higher engine capacity, the XUV 3XO generates more power output figures than the Kylaq. Its 1.2-litre turbo-petrol engine delivers 15 PS and 52 Nm more than the Kylaq’s 1-litre turbo-petrol motor that makes 115 PS and 178 Nm. Both models are offered with a 6-speed manual and a 6-speed automatic transmission option.
Features
| Features |
Mahindra XUV 3XO REVX A |
Skoda Kylaq Signature Plus |
| Exterior |
|
|
| Interior |
|
|
| Comfort Convenience |
|
|
| Infotainment |
|
|
| Safety |
|
|
When it comes to interior features, both the XUV 3XO REVX A and the Kylaq Signature Plus offer a feature-rich cabin. However, the XUV 3XO steps up in terms of premium touches. It gets a larger 10.25-inch touchscreen and a 10.25-inch digital driver’s display. The XUV 3XO also comes equipped with a panoramic sunroof, dual-zone auto AC, wireless phone charger, and connected car tech.
Safety-wise, both SUVs get six airbags, cruise control, tyre pressure monitoring system, and rear parking camera with sensors.
Verdict
Although the XUV 3XO REVX A commands a price premium, it makes a strong case with its more powerful turbo-petrol engine, richer feature list, and standout elements like the panoramic sunroof and larger displays. If you are seeking extra performance and a tech-loaded cabin, the higher price feels justified.
Meanwhile, the Kylaq Signature Plus still offers great value with its essential features, along with a more affordable price tag. and safety. At the end of the day, it depends on your priorities, do you want more features and performance, or better affordability? Let us know which one you would choose in the comments!
Write your Comment on Mahindra XUV 3XO
I would prefer the SKODA experience as I have owned a Skoda for 10 years. But would like to compare with Sonet and MG Astor also
There are numerous features and the XUV 3×0 is a good vehicle.What affects demand is the poor service credentials of Mahendra.Like Tata , Mahendra too has an below average service.