Toyota Glanza Petrol Manual And AMT Fuel Efficiency : Claimed Vs Real
The Glanza claims to offer up to 22.94kmpl and we’ve done our extensive city and highway fuel efficiency test to see what it offers in real world
- Write a comment

The Toyota Glanza is currently one of the most fuel efficient cars in its premium hatchback segment. With its latest update, the hatchback gets a 1.2-litre DualJet petrol engine with auto idle start-stop as standard.
So, let’s see how frugal the Glanza is in real world driving conditions. Here’s a look at its specifications and fuel efficiency figures:
| Specifications |
Petrol-Manual |
Petrol-AMT |
| Power |
90PS |
90PS |
| Torque |
113Nm |
113Nm |
| Gearbox |
5-speed manual |
5-speed AMT |
| Claimed fuel efficiency |
22.35kmpl |
22.94kmpl |
| Tested fuel efficiency (City) |
17.35kmpl |
16.94kmpl |
| Tested Fuel Efficiency (Highway) |
21.43kmpl |
20.31kmpl |
There’s hardly any difference between the fuel economy of the manual and AMT versions. The petrol-manual is more efficient, but by under a kmpl in the city and 1.1kmpl on the highways. So those who believe that automatics aren’t as fuel efficient as a manual stick, the Glanza proves otherwise.

Here’s how frugal it will be in mixed driving conditions:
| Mileage |
City:Highway (50:50) |
City:Highway (25:75) |
City:Highway (75:25) |
| Petrol-MT |
19.11kmpl |
20.2kmpl |
18.1kmpl |
| Petrol AMT |
18.47kmpl |
19.34kmpl | 17.67kmpl |
If the city and highway drives measure equally, the Glanza MT and AMT should deliver around 19kmpl. With a majority of highway driving, you might be able to touch or even cross 20kmpl. But, if you're driving inside the city more, you can get 17-18kmpl.
Also Read: Toyota Glanza Vs Hyundai i20 N Line Vs Tata Altroz - Space And Practicality Comparison

Do note that these figures may vary depending on the road, driving style, climate conditions, and the car’s condition. Also, if you own a Toyota Glanza, drop your findings in the comment section below. Would love to hear from you.
Read More on : Glanza AMT
1 out of 1 found this helpful














