Only Looks and Style POOR PERFORMANCE
Look and Style: Looks are always USP of all honda cars. The front grill has distinctive chrome which gives character to it. Flowing lines on the side. Though from the back it resembles the old Verna. Comfort: Seat has good thigh support. Rear bench has also good legroom even for tall passengers. Pickup: The diesel feels slightly underpowered when you compare with the new Verna or Vento. City drive is ok while overtaking on highways can create ripples due to the underpower nature of the engine. It is powered by the same mill as in the Amaze so it is little bit high on noise levels and vibrations. Mileage: Mileage will be good as city driving in congested conditions can give anything around 13 to 15KMPL and Highway will be 18-19.5 KMPL of course without AC. Best Features: Touch screen AC Controls. The Dashboard as AC vents in the middle which is smaller than the side ones and matches with the flowing lines of the dash. Rear A/C vents are functionally good. Needs to improve: Quality of seat fabric, Rear AC vent plastics are not as good as front ones. Door panels joints, bonnet joints and paint drops are visible. Overall Experience: Overall a good car looks if taken into account. But for drivers required die hard engine performance and power go for the new Verna Diesel, Vento or Skoda Rapid.
- 94 Likes
- 59 Dislikes
Other City 2015-2017 Reviews
I am driving my honda city from 2 years.its a good car to drive on highways and city but not good for bad roads due to its low ground clearance.about its engine yes it is...
Honda City 2015-2017 Further Research
Trending Honda Cars