Till date, 54 genuine users have shared their reviews on Tata Safari. Of which, 34 Users are happy with the Tata car whereas 8 Users feel otherwise, while 12 Users choose to remain neutral.
It's the same old design with a bit of garnish here and there. The front grill does change the character of the car from regal for the earlier one to butch for this one. I cant say which one looks better, but I would prefer the Dicor 3.0 . Interiors disappointingly remain the same, for quality that is. Plastic quality is a major concern and I am sure its not because of cost, TATA lacks the will.Although lacking feel, its pretty direct for a car of this size and weight and coupled with better
We bought this vehicle in 2008 because it was spacious, good looking and came at a reasonable price for the category. Just 47000 kms of running and the engine had problems with the engine stalling . Had to refurbish the entire engine and that cost a bomb with the company taking no responsibility.Good :Dealer CoverageDecent Mileage for the size, especially on longs.Space inside the cabinBoot spacePoorEngine and parts used.The interiors are pretty sad.Aesthetically the dashboard is sad and quality
Look and Style: good Comfort: Drivering Comfort not there. Pickup:Good Mileage:Good Best Features Needs to improve: Workmanship need to improve, In 10Km All Door is having Sound, Oil Leakage Problem, All caps coming out from Screw. Overall Experience: Not Good. Need to improve in Body small part & need to improve the Service Center.
Look and Style I think the looks, style, fit and finish of the new Safari Storme is miles ahead of
Look and Style: Looks wise I would give it a thumbs up but that s only when I compare it to the olde
Hi, my name is Vikram and I bought my KUV100 K6 variant in March 2016. I love the way it looked, lik
Look and Style: Looks are zero. Comfort: Comfort is zero. Pickup: Pickup is zero Mileage: Null B
It will help us serve you better content and best deals