Skoda Yeti reviewed

By for Skoda Yeti 2009-2013 from new delhi 2010-11-16 23:30:52.0
9 people found it helpful. 2759 ViewsWrite Review
3 ⁄ 5
  • Appearance
  • Performance
  • Comfort
  • Value For Money
  • Fuel Economy
  • Overall Satisfaction

Pros : build quality, mileage

Cons : looks


The vehicle comes loaded with features even in the base variant, with features like alloy wheels, hill hold control, ABS, ESP, Dual airbags, active head restraints, and glove box cooling in the base variant. The higher end variant gets new set of alloys, corner function with fog lights, side and curtain airbags, steering audio controls, climatronic dual zone AC etc in addition. It sports a 2.0 litre diesel engine producing 140 bhp of power at 4200 rpm and 320 Nm of raw torque at 1750-2500rpm. It has all time 4 wheel drive with 6 speed manual transmission, dual disc brakes and an electro mechanically assisted steering. At 4223 mm long, 1793 mm wide and 1691 mm tall and a turning circle radius of 5m,it has all the proportions to be a perfect city car as well.

Was this review useful to you? Yes 9   No 0
  • Upto 100% processing fee waiver Interest rate starting @ 9.65%*
Thanks For Voting
You have already recommended this review
  • vishal |17 Nov,2010 03:15:26 PM

    After Yeti where to dump the useless CRV's and Terracans ? Honda already lost Market share in Midsize City range after heavy booking for vento and cancellation of City bookings due to sever suspension problems and low build quality .Jazz production almost has stopped as people are finding it in actual conditions vehicle underpowered and highly overrated price

  • Vickie Vittal |18 Nov,2010 06:24:19 PM

    Wow the tin is full....i mean the features are very impressive for an suv....throw the the useless honda cr-v...i hope honda have learn their lesson....good work skoda....congradts!!!!! keep ur good work!!!

  • atul joshi |30 Jan,2011 10:33:55 PM

    this car doesnt look goo that is my onlu issue, i mean when you spend almost 1900000/- there should be a machine that looks good on road. it looks so small and so not worth the money. i would better by a chevrolet cruz instead or a honda accord. the looks a totally disappointing, as well as the size of the car. it looks like the RIO with a price tag of 19000000/- i personally will definitely not go for it.

  • gaurav haralkar |08 Sep,2011 05:22:39 PM

    atul joshi,i agree its not a eye catching car,but if u have a look inside its very spacious than other rivals and very intelligent as well above that u get a four wheel drive on such a compactt looking car,which is the plus point for it..and the built and ride qwality of skoda,no need to say how perfect it is.

  • Biju |12 Jun,2012 09:33:19 AM

    Having driven SUVs from Landcruiser to Scorpio, I have to admit that this vehicle is flop model of SKODA, it falls in no segment neither it has got any distinctive feature that would attract anyone unless he is a novice to SUVs. I have driven the 2 wheel drive version, that doesnot have any power and you need to prey to god for the vehicle to move else you need to ram the throttle to the floor. Tried this one out in the mud, engine would switch off quickly than you could imagine. The breaking is also below average. I bother with this time waster. The only that made little intrest in this tiny SUV is that the second row seat can slide front and back also this can be conveneiently removed and stoved if not needed.

  • Biju from Kerala |12 Jun,2012 09:40:49 AM

    Time Waster ??UV!!!!!! Having driven SUVs from Landcruiser to Scorpio, I have to admit that this vehicle is flop model of SKODA, it falls in no segment neither it has got any distinctive feature that would attract anyone unless he is a novice to SUVs. I have driven the 2 wheel drive version, that doesnot have any power and you need to prey to god for the vehicle to move else you need to ram the throttle to the floor. Tried this one out in the mud, engine would switch off quickly than you could imagine. The breaking is also below average. why bother with this time waster. The only that made little interest in this tiny SUV is that the second row seat can slide front and back also this can be conveniently removed and store if not needed.

Post a Comment
Your Name
Email Address
Mobile No
Comment
500 Characters Left
Indicator  Please Wait ...
Comments
 Comments Skoda Yeti 2009-2013

Skoda Yeti 2009-2013 review scorecard

  • Over all
  • 6 Months
  • 3 Months
Positive
10
Negative
3
Neutral
1
Positive
0
Negative
0
Neutral
0
Positive
0
Negative
0
Neutral
0

Advertisement

More reviews on Skoda Yeti 2009-2013

  • Run 120000 kms in 28 months and still happy
    By sumanth | 2013-06-26 12:46:40.0 | 2940 Views

    Have been using the car for 28 months and have done 120,000 kms. AC co...

  • BEST AVAILABLE SUV
    By DIWAKER from NEW DELHI | 2012-06-21 21:04:49.0 | 2571 Views

    Look and Style - FRONT LOOK IS AWESOME. A BIT FLAT FROM BACK BUT OVERA...

  • falty clutch and ac
    By akash from hyderbad | 2011-07-06 13:46:39.0 | 2996 Views

    Look and Style : Front appearence is good but rear and sides are quiet...

  • Best Suv Vechile
    By chaitufilmmaking from hyderabad | 2011-05-30 00:32:02.0 | 1923 Views

    Exterior Black looks superb and blends in with the B and C pillars. At...

  • Excellent SUV Skoda Yeti
    By karthik from Hyderabad | 2011-05-11 00:11:09.0 | 1814 Views

    Exterior Bold and Beautiful. The exteriors could be more aerodynamic t...

location

Please tell us your city

It will help us serve you better content and best deals

eg. Mumbai, Gurgaon, Delhi
My Comparison