They are improved a bit.. but still long way to go..

By for Skoda Rapid 2013-2016 2013-12-30 11:18:03.0
27 people found it helpful. 3177 ViewsWrite Review
1 ⁄ 5
  • Appearance
  • Performance
  • Comfort
  • Value For Money
  • Fuel Economy
  • Overall Satisfaction

Pros : Average, looks, comfort

Cons : After sales service


Look and Style: Above average.. Only Honda City and Hyundai Verna are better in looks. Comfort: Excellent. Pickup: Average. Mileage: 12 kmph MAXXXXXXX :( Best Features: Rear AC vent, all four one touch windows and rain sensing wipers. Needs to improve: Please remove manufacturing defects.. Improve after sale service..Overall Experience: After driving for 1 year now I also realized that it has no resale value as well.. I am fed up of Skoda staff and now going outside for service and other needs.. The only thing good about this car for new buyers is its price.. I would advice to invest smart.. Buy Honda City or Verna or even SX4..  

Was this review useful to you? Yes 27   No 6
  • Upto 100% processing fee waiver Interest rate starting @ 9.65%*
Thanks For Voting
You have already recommended this review
Post a Comment
Your Name
Email Address
Mobile No
Comment
500 Characters Left
Indicator  Please Wait ...
Comments
 Comments Skoda Rapid 2013-2016

Skoda Rapid 2013-2016 review scorecard

  • Over all
  • 6 Months
  • 3 Months
Positive
6
Negative
5
Neutral
2
Positive
3
Negative
0
Neutral
0
Positive
0
Negative
0
Neutral
0

Advertisement

More reviews on Skoda Rapid 2013-2016

location

Please tell us your city

It will help us serve you better content and best deals

eg. Mumbai, Gurgaon, Delhi
My Comparison