A quality product of honda
Its looks good, damn good but still a US based auto magazine gave the CR-V 2007 an award for the ugliest make-over of a car as compared to its previous version, wondering why?? Because they call it a SUV and it doesn't look like SUV and doesn't feels like one. It feels like a sedan and according to me thats good instead of having that heavy SUV feel but this refinement is coming at a price, firstly the cost of buying it is high(more than double of what it costs in US and other countries) and running it will also put a big dent in the pocket, as for the fuel effciency, just around 8.5kpl in city. The car has very nice and cosy interiors, it seats only five but the rear seats are movable, the fuel tank is under the fronts seats, thats why. The automatic version is effortless and for the manual, the gearshift cannot be at a more appropriate position and that too is very easy to use. The engine is very refined, responsive, and the car is very desirable.
- 2 Likes
- 1 Dislikes
Write your Comment on Honda CR-V 2007-2012
should i get this crv this very year2017. should i buy 2007 model.
i am driving CRV. This is an excellent car. i am getting fuel efficiency of 11+ KM in the city. unable to understand how this is mentioned at 7 every where. I find this a amazing SUV, excellent pickup, enough leg space, excellent interior and exterior. Value for money.Reply
sir, did u still driving cr-v ? what millage its giving u ? actully i m planing to buy 2008 2.0 ltr 2wd modle . if its give millage of 10 its good for me .Reply
Hi, I recently bought a 2008 CRV MT, its giving 11.5 KMPL on highway and 10.5 in city.
Trending Honda Cars